I was thinking the relative lack of courage the left is displaying with regards to Trump probably has something to do with having driven all the young men out of their coalition.
There are 10 federal offices for women's health, and zero offices for men's health. There is 3 times more funding for breast cancer than prostate cancer. There are female-only programs at colleges and major corporations.
The feminist-driven society (with Democrats leading the charge) has told men to get lost for decades. The bad attitude needs to change, but Democrats state on their website that they serve women, but not men.
Can the Republicans fill the void? During Trump's first term, Betsy deVos reformed Title IX rules to give college men Due Process rights in the campus feminist kangaroo courts Obama created.
That should be a starting point for Republicans to fund men's health, set up men's commissions in each state, etc.
I hope it happens but not too optimistic. Trump started this second term like a hurricane but has since slowed down... we'll see.
I'll give him this that he's injected a masculine energy again into the country and that's not a knock at Kamala - Biden was one of the most feminine catatonic presidents in all of history.
While we certainly need to push for more funding for men’s health related issues, prostate cancer is actually less aggressive than breast cancer, and men live longer with it than women. So, it makes sense that breast cancer receives more funding. It kills a lot of younger women, way more than prostrate cancer, which generally (not always) kills older men.
That being said, some men have a BRCA gene that leads to extremely aggressive prostate cancer at a young age. If any women in your family had breast cancer, you should be tested for BRCA
There are 20% more deaths from breast cancer than prostate cancer each year. Which would justify 20% more funding for breast cancer, bot 300% more funding.
Also, there are 10 offices for women’s health, and zero offices for men’s health.
In the UK, there are more prostate cancer deaths than breast cancer deaths
Also bear in mind that many of the treatments for breast cancer are also used for prostate cancer, so the funding for one benefits the other.
But yes, I agree with your point. There is DEFINITELY messaging around health that blames men for their own health and babies women. Men are getting the message that they don’t matter, especially when there are all these task forces to help women with problems that are in fact worse for men.
The reason men die younger than women isn’t biological, it’s largely behavioral both from medical providers and society. As a society, we should be scrambling to save men, since they die younger.
Agreed. You must have heard about the phenomena of men walking away from work, school, family, etc. That’s because the culture tells them that they are worthless and don’t matter
It’s a sad state of affairs a loss of connection in humanity. I recall in London I think the tipping point was early 2000 but that may be my own experience. I think the internet definitely has changed things but online friends have been brilliant for me. Including creating travel destinations to like minded people. It will be interesting to see how the next 5 to 10 years play out. I don’t think the effect of the Covid lockdowns helped either!
When it comes to talking about changing relationships between men and women, the iron law is: Thou Shalt Not Mention Internet Pornography. It has had no impact on this issue whatsoever. Going on 25 years of total leftist silence on the issue, except to point out that its totally fine.
100% spot on! I only covered it a bit here but it is the BIGGEST issue right now. Most men are exposed to it at 13 and I was one of them. I did fine with women and getting my shit together but I constantly wonder what I would have been like not being exposed to porn that young.
I absolutely agree. I feel like the biggest problem with this last election was that like- most of the guys (I don’t remember the source so fact check me on this) that voted for him didn’t actually agree with his policies, they just weren’t alienated on the right. IMO, this only made the alienation worse on the left, and I agree, there needs to be new messaging for the men. I would argue that there needs to be new messaging on both sides, but that has historically not gone well.(Also, I say all this as a minor who has barely any knowledge of politics, correct me if I’m wrong on any of the facts or anything)
Teddy Roosevelt had the Bull-Moose Party; a few years ago, we had the Tea Party. I'm not sure if a third party can survive in America but what I will say is that the energy for it is at a tipping point. It's NOW or NEVER, and I fear what happened in the EU will happen to the States.
Balkanization within the states based on different beliefs.
Women are still more NEET than men, they tend to become NEET with age. Also males aren't an homogenous groups, with white male outearning and outperforming other groups.
Pornography is mostly safe, for a nuanced approach to porn I suggest nullsci article
I agree but the trend is flipping. Moreover, historically, women were NEET by force, so we're among the first generations seeing that not be a thing anymore.
Shit, my childhood next door neighbor was a 90-year old Italian woman who was born before women could vote. The trend is new but it's accelerating and we all can see where it's heading. It's a new, unprecedented world we're in, and more men need to say no to the nihilism pill.
Add to your solutions: reform marriage and family law to require equal treatment. Require a prenup/marriage contract (something Heinlein actually described decades ago) for marriage to be valid. Require paternity testing prior to completion of a birth certificate. Change education to make modes of kinesthetic learning more available, particularly for boys. Make Financial available to people wanting to go to trade schools as an alternative to University learning.
What utter nonsense. The woe is me narrative is tedious bull shit. Plenty of men are succeeding because they are doing things to make themselves successful, and plenty of men are not succeeding because they whining about how unfair it is that women are taking every advantage of artificial brakes having been taken off of them. No one feels sorry for those failing men and no one should.
It's not so much "woe is me" as it is trying to solve a problem and figuring out how the new world will work. More of a puzzle than pity. But thanks for your valuable insight.
Love it. Great idea. And I am being totally serious. Only two problems there...
1. A lot of men hate young children. Especially ones that are not their own. From personal experience I can honestly say that living with my own children from ages 0-6/7? was practically a nightmare. That was with an unbelievable wife who sacrificed her career to be a SAHM. Just being around them in the evenings/weekends combined with my wife having much less bandwidth for me was miserable and crushing. I became an alcoholic just to cope. (tale as old as time...)
2. You couldn't pay me 500k annually to be an elementary school teacher. I earn 200k as a cloud engineer today. You couldn't pay me 1MM to be a kindergarten teacher. I would be in an impatient psych ward within 1 week. And that's coming from someone with kids who understands the value of excellent education as crucial. Now weigh that against the fact that the job pays 35k. You can earn that working at McDonald's. Good elementary school teachers exist because they are willing to sacrifice their own financial well being to provide service. In a world that valued things that were genuinely important to the human condition the teacher would get 200k and I would get 35k to sit around by myself all day to argue with others about the most cost effective way to leverage Amazon's cloud services.
Very simple, when people in fact try to over complicate it.
Things are now bleak enough for the future that men are voting for bare bones solutions rather than tolerating stupid SJW platform ideas that cost jobs and vilify men. The race game has also lost its steam and it was not possible for Dems to hold the shares of all minority votes they held for the indefinite future. In contrast, whites becoming minorities will make them vote more like brown skinned people - as a bloc.
"Higher Importance of Family" -- this is a feminist view of men! The solution for men... IS puting them more at home?? Women have run away from home and your solution for men is putting them at home? Really??
False. Men need to get rid of feminists and the left. Period.
This situation was created by the LEFT: the left has NO moral authority to come with solutions.
1. We need more Trump. We cannot rely on China. The Global elites have been trying to substitute western men by Chinese men. This stops NOW.
2. Trump has made more for the men in 3 months than the left in 3 decades.
3. Desize the Government! Men need to stop subsidiazing females work.
4. We dont need more males teachers: we need to make education single sex again. Co ed was an invention of feminist and we need to tear that apart
And first of all: we need to recognise that feminist IS false. The gender gap had nothing to do with "machismo". It was just that males industries were more productive.
Males are not angry because of a gender gap. They are angry because they have been treated like shit!
The left is by default the Misandrist party.
Sad but true. Didn't used to be that way when you had gun-toting guys like Hunter Thompson or Hemingway. They'd be right-wing today.
I was thinking the relative lack of courage the left is displaying with regards to Trump probably has something to do with having driven all the young men out of their coalition.
Correct. They state right on their website that they serve women, but not men.
There are 10 federal offices for women's health, and zero offices for men's health. There is 3 times more funding for breast cancer than prostate cancer. There are female-only programs at colleges and major corporations.
The feminist-driven society (with Democrats leading the charge) has told men to get lost for decades. The bad attitude needs to change, but Democrats state on their website that they serve women, but not men.
Can the Republicans fill the void? During Trump's first term, Betsy deVos reformed Title IX rules to give college men Due Process rights in the campus feminist kangaroo courts Obama created.
That should be a starting point for Republicans to fund men's health, set up men's commissions in each state, etc.
I hope it happens but not too optimistic. Trump started this second term like a hurricane but has since slowed down... we'll see.
I'll give him this that he's injected a masculine energy again into the country and that's not a knock at Kamala - Biden was one of the most feminine catatonic presidents in all of history.
They both are, effectively, cognitively brain dead. But for different reasons
While we certainly need to push for more funding for men’s health related issues, prostate cancer is actually less aggressive than breast cancer, and men live longer with it than women. So, it makes sense that breast cancer receives more funding. It kills a lot of younger women, way more than prostrate cancer, which generally (not always) kills older men.
That being said, some men have a BRCA gene that leads to extremely aggressive prostate cancer at a young age. If any women in your family had breast cancer, you should be tested for BRCA
There are 20% more deaths from breast cancer than prostate cancer each year. Which would justify 20% more funding for breast cancer, bot 300% more funding.
Also, there are 10 offices for women’s health, and zero offices for men’s health.
In the UK, there are more prostate cancer deaths than breast cancer deaths
Also bear in mind that many of the treatments for breast cancer are also used for prostate cancer, so the funding for one benefits the other.
But yes, I agree with your point. There is DEFINITELY messaging around health that blames men for their own health and babies women. Men are getting the message that they don’t matter, especially when there are all these task forces to help women with problems that are in fact worse for men.
The reason men die younger than women isn’t biological, it’s largely behavioral both from medical providers and society. As a society, we should be scrambling to save men, since they die younger.
Agreed. You must have heard about the phenomena of men walking away from work, school, family, etc. That’s because the culture tells them that they are worthless and don’t matter
In the UK, you have to look at the age of death of prostate cancer which is significantly older than breast cancer.
It’s a sad state of affairs a loss of connection in humanity. I recall in London I think the tipping point was early 2000 but that may be my own experience. I think the internet definitely has changed things but online friends have been brilliant for me. Including creating travel destinations to like minded people. It will be interesting to see how the next 5 to 10 years play out. I don’t think the effect of the Covid lockdowns helped either!
When it comes to talking about changing relationships between men and women, the iron law is: Thou Shalt Not Mention Internet Pornography. It has had no impact on this issue whatsoever. Going on 25 years of total leftist silence on the issue, except to point out that its totally fine.
100% spot on! I only covered it a bit here but it is the BIGGEST issue right now. Most men are exposed to it at 13 and I was one of them. I did fine with women and getting my shit together but I constantly wonder what I would have been like not being exposed to porn that young.
13. Child sexual abuse of the boy hate-watching in horror. And they know it.
Thank you. Here’s a classic from 05 - one of a million examples showing how they’ve been gaslighting us for decades.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/articles/200501/advice-he-likes-porn
I absolutely agree. I feel like the biggest problem with this last election was that like- most of the guys (I don’t remember the source so fact check me on this) that voted for him didn’t actually agree with his policies, they just weren’t alienated on the right. IMO, this only made the alienation worse on the left, and I agree, there needs to be new messaging for the men. I would argue that there needs to be new messaging on both sides, but that has historically not gone well.(Also, I say all this as a minor who has barely any knowledge of politics, correct me if I’m wrong on any of the facts or anything)
Teddy Roosevelt had the Bull-Moose Party; a few years ago, we had the Tea Party. I'm not sure if a third party can survive in America but what I will say is that the energy for it is at a tipping point. It's NOW or NEVER, and I fear what happened in the EU will happen to the States.
Balkanization within the states based on different beliefs.
Hell yeah. Bull Moose 2028.
Great work, bud. Keep observing and reporting. We need more like you. 💪
Thanks for the support!! 🤘
This narrative IS false. Its a feminist and lefty way to see men.
We have pushed men our of Board, doctors and lawyers and now... We Will give men 'stay at home" and "be a kindergarten teacher" as solution? Really??
Women are still more NEET than men, they tend to become NEET with age. Also males aren't an homogenous groups, with white male outearning and outperforming other groups.
Pornography is mostly safe, for a nuanced approach to porn I suggest nullsci article
I agree but the trend is flipping. Moreover, historically, women were NEET by force, so we're among the first generations seeing that not be a thing anymore.
Shit, my childhood next door neighbor was a 90-year old Italian woman who was born before women could vote. The trend is new but it's accelerating and we all can see where it's heading. It's a new, unprecedented world we're in, and more men need to say no to the nihilism pill.
You must break out of the fake left-right paradigm. It’s only function is to divide and conquer
Add to your solutions: reform marriage and family law to require equal treatment. Require a prenup/marriage contract (something Heinlein actually described decades ago) for marriage to be valid. Require paternity testing prior to completion of a birth certificate. Change education to make modes of kinesthetic learning more available, particularly for boys. Make Financial available to people wanting to go to trade schools as an alternative to University learning.
What utter nonsense. The woe is me narrative is tedious bull shit. Plenty of men are succeeding because they are doing things to make themselves successful, and plenty of men are not succeeding because they whining about how unfair it is that women are taking every advantage of artificial brakes having been taken off of them. No one feels sorry for those failing men and no one should.
It's not so much "woe is me" as it is trying to solve a problem and figuring out how the new world will work. More of a puzzle than pity. But thanks for your valuable insight.
More Male Teachers
Love it. Great idea. And I am being totally serious. Only two problems there...
1. A lot of men hate young children. Especially ones that are not their own. From personal experience I can honestly say that living with my own children from ages 0-6/7? was practically a nightmare. That was with an unbelievable wife who sacrificed her career to be a SAHM. Just being around them in the evenings/weekends combined with my wife having much less bandwidth for me was miserable and crushing. I became an alcoholic just to cope. (tale as old as time...)
2. You couldn't pay me 500k annually to be an elementary school teacher. I earn 200k as a cloud engineer today. You couldn't pay me 1MM to be a kindergarten teacher. I would be in an impatient psych ward within 1 week. And that's coming from someone with kids who understands the value of excellent education as crucial. Now weigh that against the fact that the job pays 35k. You can earn that working at McDonald's. Good elementary school teachers exist because they are willing to sacrifice their own financial well being to provide service. In a world that valued things that were genuinely important to the human condition the teacher would get 200k and I would get 35k to sit around by myself all day to argue with others about the most cost effective way to leverage Amazon's cloud services.
Another problem, from speaking to a few guys in high school teaching, is that many men are afraid of accusations of molestation.
The fact that "Masculinity Will Not Save Men" was written by a woman is like me writing an article about what to expect during the third trimester.
Very simple, when people in fact try to over complicate it.
Things are now bleak enough for the future that men are voting for bare bones solutions rather than tolerating stupid SJW platform ideas that cost jobs and vilify men. The race game has also lost its steam and it was not possible for Dems to hold the shares of all minority votes they held for the indefinite future. In contrast, whites becoming minorities will make them vote more like brown skinned people - as a bloc.
his narrative IS false. Its a feminist and lefty way to see men.
We have pushed men our of Board, doctors and lawyers and now... We Will give men 'stay at home" and "be a kindergarten teacher" as solution? Really??
"Higher Importance of Family" -- this is a feminist view of men! The solution for men... IS puting them more at home?? Women have run away from home and your solution for men is putting them at home? Really??
False. Men need to get rid of feminists and the left. Period.
This situation was created by the LEFT: the left has NO moral authority to come with solutions.
1. We need more Trump. We cannot rely on China. The Global elites have been trying to substitute western men by Chinese men. This stops NOW.
2. Trump has made more for the men in 3 months than the left in 3 decades.
3. Desize the Government! Men need to stop subsidiazing females work.
4. We dont need more males teachers: we need to make education single sex again. Co ed was an invention of feminist and we need to tear that apart
And first of all: we need to recognise that feminist IS false. The gender gap had nothing to do with "machismo". It was just that males industries were more productive.
Males are not angry because of a gender gap. They are angry because they have been treated like shit!
Long life to Trump!